PKM Implementasi Numerasi pada Pembelajaran bagi Guru MGMP Matematika SMA Kabupaten Semarang
Keywords:
Training, Numeracy, STEM, Computational Thinking, Wolfram, AssessmentAbstract
The "Implementation of Numeracy in Mathematics Learning" training was designed for members of the Mathematics MGMP with the aim of strengthening skills in applying numeracy concepts in the learning process. This training introduces various practical methods for integrating numeracy in mathematics learning, including the application of numeracy in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) curriculum. Technology is also introduced in this training, with the use of software such as Wolfram Mathematica. This software provides sophisticated tools for data visualization and manipulation, which can enrich the mathematics learning experience interactively and deeply (Wolfram, 2020). In addition, this training discusses effective numeracy assessment methods to measure student understanding and progress, such as practical assignments, tests, and constructive feedback (Shute, 2008). During the training, participants discuss challenges and solutions in implementing numeracy, as well as sharing best practices and experiences between participants (Sowder, 2007). Group activities are also carried out to design and test numeracy-based lesson plans, allowing participants to apply the concepts learned in real learning situations (Tharp & Gallimore, 1988). The purpose of this training is to improve the effectiveness of mathematics teaching, support the development of students' numeracy, and facilitate the application of numeracy in daily learning. The Community Partnership Program (PKM) focuses on two main activities: first, providing training to teachers on the application of numeracy in learning, and second, training teachers to design learning tools that integrate numeracy. Thus, this training is expected to optimize mathematics teaching and strengthen students' numeracy skills through an approach based on interactive teaching, technology, and effective assessment.
References
Aini, S. N., & Pramasdyahsari, A. S. (2023). Pendampingan Simulasi Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum berbasis Literasi Digital untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi dan Adaptasi Teknologi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa, 1(6), 573-583.
Aini, S. N., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., & Setyawati, R. D. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berpikir Kritis Matematis Berbasis PjBL STEM Menggunakan Pendekatan Etnomatematika. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 2118-2126.
Astutik, I. D., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., & Setyawati, R. D. (2024). Development of PJBL-STEM based E-books Assisted by Geometry Calculator to Foster Students' Critical Thinking Ability. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 15(1), 69-82.
OECD. (2010). The High Cost of Low Educational Performance: The Long-Run Economic Impact of Underperforming Education Systems. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264072738-en
Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Ueno, K. (2013). Are comprehensive school reform programs really effective? A meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 481-515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313490701
Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2014). Teaching Mathematics: A Handbook for the Primary and Secondary Classroom. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4594-8
Rice, J. K. (2010). The Impact of Teacher Quality on the Achievement Gap. Journal of Educational Policy, 25(6), 693-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.521249
Borko, H. (2013). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Policy, 24(4), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431245001
Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Ballantine Books.
Geary, D. C. (2013). Mathematical Cognition: A Review of Current Research and Theory. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.08.002
Cavanagh, M., & McMaster, H. (2016). Early Intervention in Numeracy: A Study of the Effects of Early Interventions on the Mathematical Performance of Students. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.1.0059
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Harun, L., & Pramasdyahsari, A. S. (2023). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 180-190.
Lutfiyana, L., Dwijayanti, I., & Pramasdyahsari, A. S. (2021). Kemampuan literasi matematika dalam penyelesaian masalah aturan sinus dan kosinus ditinjau dari pemahaman konsep. Jurnal Gantang, 6(2), 151-162.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543015002004
Widjaja, W. (2012). The Impact of Teacher Knowledge on Student Learning in Mathematics in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0020-1
Susanto, H. (2014). Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: The Case of Indonesian Mathematics Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 1031-1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9443-3
English, L. D. (2016). Numeracy and STEM Education: Integrating Mathematical Thinking with the Sciences. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0022-4
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Grover, S., & Pea, R. D. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12 Education. Education Digest, 78(7), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313490701
Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media.
OECD. (2013). Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2022 tentang Penilaian Pembelajaran.
Pramasdyasari, A. S., Aini, S. N., & Setyawati, R. D. (2024). Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills through Ethnomathematics Digital Book STEM-PjBL. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 97-112.
Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Setyawati, R. D., Aini, S. N., Nusuki, U., Arum, J. P., Astutik, I. D., ... & Salmah, U. (2023). Fostering students’ mathematical critical thinking skills on number patterns through digital book STEM PjBL. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2297.
Pramasdyahsari, A. S. (2023). Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Literasi Matematika melalui Digital Book Berbasis STEM-PJBL.
Pratiwi, A. D., Nugroho, A. A., Setyawati, R. D., & Raharjo, S. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Pada Siswa Kelas IV Di SD Negeri Tlogosari 01 Semarang. JANACITTA, 6(1), 38-47.
Becker, J. R., & Park, K. (2011). "Teaching Mathematics in the Context of STEM Education: A Review of Research." Journal of Research in Mathematics Education.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Sari, E. K., Sugiyanti, S., & Pramasdyahsari, A. S. (2021). Profil kemampuan literasi matematis siswa berkemampuan matematika tinggi dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita berbasis PISA. Jurnal Gantang, 6(1), 83-92.
Setyawati, R. D., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Astutik, I. D., Nusuki, U., Aini, S. N., Arum, J. P., ... & Zuliah, N. (2022). Improving mathematical critical thinking skill through STEM-PjBL: A systematic literature review. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 4(2), 1-17.
Setyawati, R. D., Prasad, B., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., & Aini, S. N. (2023). Construct the Validity of STEM and Project-based Critical Thinking Skills Test Instruments Using the Rasch Model. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(1), 96-110.
Shute, V. J. (2008). "Focus on Formative Feedback." Review of Educational Research.
Silvia, R. D., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., & Nizaruddin, N. (2023). Analisis kemampuan computational thinking siswa pada materi aljabar ditinjau dari pemecahan masalah matematis. Prismatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 176-190.
Sowder, J. (2007). "The Mathematical Education and Development of Teachers." In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 157-223). Information Age Publishing.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge University Press.
Tyas, B. N. M. W., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Budiarti, R., & Utami, R. E. (2024). Profil numerasi siswa kelas X SMK dalam materi permutasi kombinasi berdasarkan kemampuan matematis. ELIPS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 190-199.
Wulandari, P., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Prasetyowati, D., & Handayaningsih, M. (2024). Profil Kemampuan Numerasi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal SPLTV pada Siswa kelas X SMA ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika (JIPM), 6(1), 13-28.
